Image via Wikipedia
Yesterday I published a post over at LibertyNews.com that points to some recent news about Sarah Palin. From Palin’s rally in Iowa, to the controversy over Christine O’Donnell, to her appearance with the Tea Party Express in New Hampshire, there is a ton of news/buzz flowing and it’s hard to determine what to make of it all.
That said, I’m going to step out on a limb and answer the question so many friends and followers have asked, which is “what do you think Sarah Palin will do?
As far as predictions go, I’m at 100% so far. I predicted Mike Huckabee wouldn’t run about a month before his announcement. I don’t think I ever believed Donald Trump would run. I was saying Rick Perry would run a few weeks before he did and I called it on Bachmann long before she made the announcement.
To be fair, it didn’t require a rocket scientist to make those predictions, but at least I’m part of the small crowd that was right on all of them. Will my prediction record end with Sarah Palin? And what is my prediction?
My prediction with Sarah Palin is that she does not run and endorses Rick Perry. There are multiple reasons for this, none of which have not already been covered by others, but all of which play a role in me throwing my opinion of the scenario out there in the form of a prediction.
1) The RGA Relationship With Rick Perry – Governor Palin, through the Republican Governor’s Association, has a relationship with Rick Perry. I can’t find any big evidence suggesting they’re “good” friends, but it’s clear they know each other and have never really been at odds. In fact, all evidence (and there isn’t a lot of it) suggests they strongly support each other and always have.
2) Palin Endorsed Rick Perry’s Re-Election Campaign – Rick Perry faced a fairly tough primary challenge last time around. For a while it looked as if he might have actually been toppled by the more libertarian candidate in the primary. After a comment about “trutherism” on the Glenn Beck show knocked that candidate out, Perry pulled out ahead and won.
That victory didn’t come without the help of Sarah Palin. In fact, Pain endorsed Rick Perry and hit the campaign trail for his re-election efforts. Now this doesn’t mean she can’t now oppose him, but doing so would be much tougher and call into question her own decision making in candidates she supports.
3) The Tea Party Showdown – I keep asking myself “does Sarah Palin really want to go to political war with Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Ron Paul and Rick Perry?” You have to keep in mind that all of these candidates have tea party support. Tea partiers have contributed to and volunteered for these campaigns, and running against them would mean running against factions of the movement.
I could be wrong, but I just don’t think Palin wants to engage in that war.
4) Campaign Infrastructure – I know Palin likes to “go rogue” in the way she does things, but even as a rogue candidate you have to have infrastructure of some sort. Media is great, but media alone does not turn out voters.
Palin has almost ZERO campaign infrastructure in place in battleground states. Furthermore, there aren’t many folks with experience left and hiring a competent team this late in the game would be very difficult.
5) Filing Deadlines – While no state ballot deadline has been crossed as of yet, there are a few on the horizon and Palin has to announce either way within the next few weeks.
6) Continued Relevance – This one is vital. Palin is a media machine and few in politics are able to drive narratives like she can. Plus, Palin is a MAJOR figure in the modern day tea party movement. If Palin isn’t going to run, she’ll have to do something big to remain relevant. She’ll also need to do something with her active and eager support base.
If Palin endorses Perry, it would seal the deal on giving Perry an almost overwhelming amount of tea party support. It would also keep Palin in a key position as an important player in the POTUS race. Palin would essentially become a king-maker in some ways, and would still be just as valuable int he eyes of the media.
7) The Romney Death Blow – A few months back Sarah Palin turned up in New Hampshire on the same day as Romney and robbed him of headlines across the nation. Palin knows New Hampshire is Romney’s ticket and she needs to hammer him down regardless of whether or not she runs.
If Palin were to endorse Rick Perry at a tea party event in New Hampshire, she would essentially deliver a death blow to Romney in his strongest state. Palin keeps her title as being the tea party fighter, she gets millions and millions of earned media, she knocks Romney out with an uppercut, she remains a critical figure in the 2012 election and she doesn’t have to initiate a campaign of her own. Nor would she have to go to the mat with Bachmann, Paul, Perry and Cain.
I could most certainly be wrong on this, but would be shocked if that turns out to be the case. At the very least she doesn’t run, and if she doesn’t run an endorsement would seem the next logical step.
So there you have it…
-Eric Odom



I’m not saying I disagree with your logic here but this would play right into the hands of the RNC establishment. This would be a tragic mistake for which I would never be able to forgive Sarah Palin.
I am still sore at her for actively campaigning for John McCain’s re-election in 2010.
Perry’s popularity is very tenuous and superficial…unless Palin muddies the water with an endorsement before the next debate. Worst possible scenario.
I am counting on her being smarter than that.
I totally agree and am hoping that is what she does. I do love her but I think she’s a bigger force to deal with her calling people out and making statements. And doing what she has been doing actually has more of an impact on public thinking at the moment. I have been a supporter from day one, but I think she’s better off looking to 2016 or 2020!
“I could most certainly be wrong on this” lol you are tragically wrong on so many levels.
I like your POV, and hope you’re right. Sarah is a GREAT speaker, and can do more for the movement outside the formal political structure than within it. My ticket of choice is Perry – Bachmann. I think it’s a winner at the ballot box, and a conservative force to be reckoned with.
The ticket cannot be Perry-Bachmann for two reasons. The first is that a ticket with two conservatives does not bind together the entire Republican party in all of its constituencies. The second is if you are going to go with two conservatives in the absence of balancing a ticket to try and bind together the entire Republican party, you need to have as a VP someone who brings in other intangibles that appeal to important constituencies that the presidential candidate either does not or does not to the extent they can with the VP on the ticket. In 2008, McCain did this by adding Palin to his ticket.
If Perry is the candidate, there is nothing Bachmann brings to the ticket that Perry himself does not have so in the absence of putting Romney on as VP for the party balancing act ala Reagan-Bush, it would have to be some other conservative who does bring something in addition to what Perry brings if they are to go with the (less likely but still possible) two conservative route.
I most certainly agree with you on this post Eric! Palin would be more beneficial to us if she were not one of the candidates.
I made same prediction to a Perry GovOfc employee that SarahPalin would endorse Perry along with RudyGiuliani. Interesting after last MonNite debate that Palin was echoing Bachmann’s overdone and unfair condemnation of Perry’s MerchGardasil mistake that he admitted. It made me wonder if the prediction would bear out….
I don’t know what Palin will do. But I know what she will not do. She will not endorse Perry until he proves a viable candidate surmounting and answering the criticisms made against him.
I disagree with Shawn. This is a different time from other elections. Obama is destroying the Progressive movement and making it lose face. At this point the only way Obama can win is through corrupting the election. If it is an honest election, conservatives can take it all. No balance is needed on a ticket today. NY29 proves that conservatives can win handily even in historically liberal areas. The country is moving to the right. Why balance a ticket? We can win with two conservatives today. If Perry is the one, a Perry/Rubio ticket would take the electorate by storm. Wouldn’t it be fun to watch that Rubio/Biden debate?
Palin had to support McCain in 2010. His opponent was not a better candidate. And McCain chose her. I have no trouble with her supporting him there.
My dream ticket is still Palin/Toomey or Palin/Rubio. I make no predictions how things will turn out. But I know Palin loves this country and I agree with her on more issues than I agree with any other candidate. Perry bothers me on his immigration ideas. Palin doesn’t bother me on anything she stands for.
Another reason I want her to run and win is to prove wrong my conservative friends who keep telling me she is not electable. Also I love the way she drives liberals crazy.